Analyzing Actors' Relation for Apparel Industry Scenarios Using Mactor Method

1. Jarke, M., Bui, X.T., Carrol, J.M., (1998), ScenarioManagement: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Requirements Engineering, 3, 155-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007660050002

2. Moniz, A.B., (2006), "Scenarios Building Methods as a Tool for Policy Analysis" in Innovative Comparative Methods as a Tool for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide, pp.185-209, Editor: Rihoux, B., Grimm, H., Springer, New York http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28829-5_9

3. Mietzner, D., Reger, G., (2005), Advantages and Disadvantages of Scenario Approaches for Strategic Foresight, International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 1, 2, 220-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2005.006516

4. Huss WR, Honton EJ., (1987), Scenario Planning-What Styles Should You Use, Long Range Planning, 20, 4, 21-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(87)90152-X

5. Keller, J., Von der Gracht, A.H., (2013), The Influence of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on Future Foresight Processes-Results from a Delphi Survey, Technological Forecasting for Social Change, Online olarak erişilebilir: 4 August 2013.

6. Godet, M., (2000), The Art of Scenarios and Strategic Planning: Tools and Pitfalls, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65, 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00120-1

7. Bendahan, S., Camponovo, G., Monzani, J.S., Pigneur, Y., (2005), Negotiation in Technology Landscapes: An Actor- Issue Analysis, Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 4, 137-172.

8. Bendahan, S., Camponovo, G., Pigneur, Y., (2003), Multi-Issue Actor Analysis: Tools and Models, Journal of Decision Systems, 12, 4, 1-31.

9. Varho V, Tapio P., (2005), Wind Power in Finland up to the Year 2025-Soft Scenarios Based on Expert Views, Energy Policy, 33: 1930-1947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.03.006

10. Dolek B., (2002), Turkiye'deki E-Ticaret Aktivitelerinde Senaryo Planlama Yontemi ile Incelenmesi, Istanbul Teknik Universitesi Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Istanbul.

11. Polat S, Asan U., (2005), Scenario Based Competence Designation: Competence Perspectives on Managing Internal Processes, Advances in Applied Business Strategy, 7, 51-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6826(04)07003-9

12. Bergman J, Viljainen S, Kassi T, Partanen J, Laaksonen P., (2006), Managing the Exploration of New Operational and Strategic Activities Using the Scenario Method-Assessing Future Capabilities in the Field of Electricity Distribution Industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 104, 46-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.01.013

13. Saricam, C., Kalaoglu, F., Polat, S.,Cassill, N.L., (2013), Application of Godet's Scenario Methodology to the Turkish Apparel Industry, Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 21, 2(98), 7-12

14. Munteanu, R., Apetroae, M. (2007), Journal Relatedness: An Actor-Actor and Actor – Objectives Case Study, Scientometrics, 73, 2, 215-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1735-7

15. Godet, M., (1991), Actors' Moves and Strategies: The Mactor Method: An Air Transport Case Study, Futures, 23, 6, 605-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(91)90082-D

16. Lafourcade, B., Chapuy, P., (2000), Scenarios and Actors' Strategies: The Case of Agri-Foodstuff Sector, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65, 67–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00128-6

17. Saricam, C., Kalaoglu, F., Polat, S., (2012), Determination of the Key Variables for Future Anticipation in Turkish Apparel Industry, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 22,2, 138-143.